Legal Opinion

Gamble v. L. B. Menefee Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in vacating the order of dismissal and dismissing the defendant’s plea of res judicata. Plaintiff’s motion for reinstatement of the cause was on the ground “that notice of the intention to dismiss said cause was given pursuant to Rule 79 of this court or otherwise or at all as required by law’ ’. The words ‘ ‘ or otherwise or at all as required by law” indicate that the omission of the word “not” between the words “was” and “given” was a clerical error. The affidavit in support of the notice to reinstate shows that no notice was given to either…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hanthorn v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Stillwell v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co. v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Spence v. HullOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. Pacific Live Stock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kelley v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API