Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Payne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 23, 1990No. 89-0975Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGarrett, Judge

A Fort Lauderdale police officer testified that he taped a telephone' conversation while assigned to a special crack cocaine investigation unit. The telephone call began as a two-party conversation between the Cl and the officer. The Cl then dialed a third party. The officer testified that the Cl “let [him] listen in to the conversation.” The officer tape-recorded both conversations. On the same day, the officer obtained a warrant to search a house. At trial, over defense counsel’s objection, the judge admitted the tape into evidence.

I respectfully dissent to the majority holding that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Joseph C. Amsler and John W. Irwin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. State v. TsavarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Worley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  5. State v. WelkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API