In re the Marriage of Sherman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Husband appeals from a dissolution decree, contending that the trial court’s division of the marital assets was unjust and improper in the circumstances. ORS 107.105(l)(e).
Husband and wife, ages 43 and 40, respectively, were wed in July 1954 and have two emancipated children. The parties’ principal assets are their family home, with equity of approximately $25,000, and two land sale contracts, with outstanding balances of approximately $112,000 at the time of trial. One land sale contract of approximately $19,000 relates to a small tavern that the parties operated jointly. The second…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of KitsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of DietzOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of LakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Marriage of DragtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989