Legal Opinion

ARMSTRONG v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02094Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM ARMSTRONG : CIVIL ACTION v. : : ANDREW SAUL, : Commissioner of the Social Security : Administration : NO. 19-2094 MEMORANDUM CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE June 9, 2020 On February 26, 2020, this court concluded that this case should be remanded, because William Armstrong (“Plaintiff”)’s administrative law judge (“ALJ”) was not appointed in conformity with the federal constitution’s Appointments Clause, a point the Commissioner conceded, and that he did not forfeit the claim by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Andrew Cirko v. Commissioner Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Morgan v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API