Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

It is necessary to express an opinion upon the following three questions submitted by this appeal: (1) Is the receiver of the Paul E. Williams Co. of Oregon, which was a broker licensed under the provisions of § 25-1309, Oregon Code 1930, to sell securities in this state, entitled to maintain an action upon the bond executed by that broker and its surety, pursuant to the section of our laws just mentioned; (2) can he, in his official capacity, maintain this action upon the bond just mentioned as assignee of claims held by the holders of interim certificates issued by the broker; and (3) can…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. State Ex Rel. Dyer v. FrancisOregon Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  2. Butte Motor Co. v. StrandOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Lank v. New York Stock ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API