Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 17, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Following a mistrial in 2002, Daniels was retried in 2005 on charges of armed assault with intent to murder, mayhem, and assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon. At trial, she moved unsuccessfully for a required finding of not guilty. See Mass. R. Crim. P. 25 (a), 378 Mass. 896 (1979). The jury later became deadlocked, and the judge declared a mistrial. Daniels moved unsuccessfully in the Superior Court to dismiss the charges, claiming that the Commonwealth’s evidence was insufficient to sustain any convictions, and that, accordingly, principles of double jeopardy barred retrial.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Berry v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Kater v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. BartoloniMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. Hap LayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrassieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. GrassieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. GrassieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API