Steinman v. Kreider
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 181, Oct. T., 1911, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Lancaster Co., Feb. T., 1911, No. 29, making absolute rule to dissolve attachment in case of Susan Steinman v. Charles Kreider. Rule to dissolve attachment.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 181, Oct. T., 1911, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Lancaster Co., Feb. T., 1911, No. 29, making absolute rule to dissolve attachment in case of Susan Steinman v. Charles Kreider. Rule to dissolve attachment. Hassler, J., filed the following opinion: This is an application to dissolve an attachment under the act of 1869. The affidavit gives as the ground for issuing it (1) that the defendant has "assigned, disposed of or removed or is about to assign, dispose of, or remove his property, money, rights in action, evidence of debt which he has or did have, with intent to defraud…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This action was begun by attachment under the Act of March 17, 1869, P. L. 8, as amended by the Act of 'May 24, 1887, P. L. 197. The defendant filed a sworn answer denying many of the facts alleged in what is styled “plaintiff’s affidavit of claim,” upon which the attachment issued, and denying particularly the allegations of fraud. This answer concluded with the suggestion “that the attachment should be dissolved, it having caused him a great inconvenience and financial loss.” Between three and four months later the defendant presented his petition and affidavit, conforming in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hall v. OysterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Wetherald v. ShupeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Lafferty v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Slingluff, Johns & Co. v. SislerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Ingram v. OrangersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907