Conte v. Aprea
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Tom, J.P.,
dissents in a memorandum as follows: A lease provision restricting use of the vehicle to “licensed, qualified operators” is reasonable, consistent with New York State law, promotes the strong public policy favoring freedom of contract *228and advances the legislative policy of heightening the degree of care owners are encouraged to exercise when selecting and supervising drivers whom they permit to operate their vehicles. Therefore, I respectfully dissent and would grant defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation’s (NMAC) dismissal motion.. Defendant Ribaudo leased a 1998 Nissan…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morris v. Snappy Car Rental, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Murdza v. ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Ruttenberg v. Davidge Data Systems Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Plath v. JustusNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Rolfe v. . HewittNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.