Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lawyer v. Fritcher

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1889Published

Appeal from a judgment entered, upon the verdict of a jury rendered at the Scbobarie Circuit, in tbe office of the clerk of Schoharie county on the 17th day of January, 1889, and, also, from an order made by the justice presiding at the trial denying a motion for a new trial, made upon the minutes of the court.

1DissentLbauNbd, P. J.

The defendant, a married man over sixty years of age, took plaintiffs daughter Edith, about seventeen years old, from her father’s house on Monday, May seventeenth. He did this with the consent *592of the parents. But the verdict of the jury establishes that he obtained this consent by fraud. That night he stayed with her at a hotel and occupied the same bed with her, saying to the landlady that Edith was. his wife. The next day he arrived with her at his own house. They occupied the same bed and he made a similar statement, viz., that he had been manned to her the day before. When there Edith’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hewit v. PrimeNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Clark v. FitchNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  3. Martin v. PayneNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  4. Bartley v. . RichtmyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. Humble v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API