State ex rel. Larger v. Scow
North Dakota Supreme Court
Original proceeding by tbe state on tbe relation of William’ Langer, Attorney General, upon an information in tbe nature of quo warranto •against Emil Scow and J. A. Power to oust tbe defendants from tbe •offices of members of tbe state board of regents.
1Opinion of the CourtBirdzele, J.
There is involved in tbis case tbe right of tbe defendants, Scow and Power, to continue in office, as members of tbe board ■of regents of tbis state, after July 1, 1917. Tbe facts with reference to their original appointment and confirmation are fully set forth in tbe writer’s dissenting opinion in tbe case of State ex rel. Langer v. Crawford, 36 N. D. 385, 162 N. W. 725. Tbe statement of facts found therein is adopted for all purposes of tbis opinion, and in addition it need only be stated that, prior to tbe institution of tbis proceeding, Totten and Muir were appointed by tbe governor, at a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Clarke v. IrwinNevada Supreme Court · 1869
- Commonwealth v. FowlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- State ex rel. Standish v. BoucherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- People ex rel. Graham v. InglisIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Dunbar v. CroninArizona Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Wehe v. FrazierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- State Ex Rel. Olson v. WelfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- People Ex Rel. Warren v. ChristianWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Giles, Attorney General v. HydeUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- State ex rel. Schara v. HolmesMontana Supreme Court · 1956