Legal Opinion

Bronson v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 25, 1993No. Docket No. 5211-91Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

CARMEL M. BRONSON, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Bronson v. Commissioner

Docket No. 5211-91

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1993-233; 1993 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 235; 65 T.C.M. (CCH) 2791;

May 25, 1993, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Carmel M. Bronson, pro se.

For respondent: William S. Garofalo, Brendan G. King, and James Gehres.

JACOBS

JACOBS

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

JACOBS, Judge: Respondent determined the following deficiencies in and additions to petitioner's Federal income tax:

Additions to Tax under Sections

Year

Deficiency

6651

6653(a)

6653(a)(1)

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  2. Rose v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  3. Joyce Purcell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. James L. Rose and Judy S. Rose v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Purcell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API