Legal Opinion

Adams v. NaphCare, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 18, 2003No. 2020312PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Timmy E. Adams, a prisoner proceeding pro se, on February 11, 2002, sued NaphCare, Inc.1, and the wardens of the following correctional facilities: Kilby Correctional Facility, St. Clair Correctional Facility, Easterling Correctional Facility, Donaldson Correctional Facility, and Staten Correctional Facility (the correctional facilities are hereinafter collectively referred to as "the department defendants"). Adams alleged in his complaint that, from the time of his incarceration until the filing of his complaint, he had been forced to shave his facial hair and that, as a result, he suffers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Eubanks v. McCollumCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. T.B. v. A.J.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pike v. ReedCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  2. Tice v. TiceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Durgin v. Fairhope Health & Rehab, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  4. Flexicrew Staffing, Inc. v. ChampionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  5. Knight v. John Knox Manor, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API