Legal Opinion
Boyer v. Austin
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided September 24, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Mahaslca District Coxirt. Action at law upon the guaranty of a promissory note. The cause was submitted to the court without a jury, and upon a finding of facts a judgment was rendered for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
l.RESADJTJDIonmitmeiit” guar-’ aaty' I. The answer of defendant, among other defenses, pleaded a former adjudication between the same parties in an action in the Circuit Court involving ° same cause of action. Other defenses set up fhe answer need not be specified. The District Court found that in an action between plaintiffs and defendant upon the guaranty sued upon in this action, the Circuit Court rendered a judgment in the following words:
“And. now on this day the parties appear, the plaintiffs by their attorney, and the -defendant by his attorneys, and the court having had this cause…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cox v. Carrell & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1858
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harrison v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Kern v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Reeves & Co. v. Lamm Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907