Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Richland Township v. Hellerman

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1977No. Appeal, No. 676 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Appellants, Earl- H. Hellerman, Sr., and Prodex, Inc., were convicted in summary proceedings of violating certain provisions of the Richland Township Zoning Ordinance of 1972. Richland Township is a part of Bucks County. - '

Prior to the enactment of the township’s zoning ordinance in 1972, appellants used part of a-leased lot for their metal fabrication operation. The lot-is located on the south side of Cherry Road and extends southward along Nice Street, which is perpendicular to Cherry Road.

Appellant’s industrial use became' a legal nonconforming use under the 1972…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Bamash v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Abbey v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. McKay v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. In re Condemnation by the CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. D'Emilio v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API