Jones v. LICO STEEL

JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge,

concurring.

The issue in this case is whether the application for review was sufficiently specific in compliance with 8CSR20-3.030(3)(A).1 The Commission granted the *716motion to strike the application for review for failure to comply with the rule. I agree that the application for review could have more specifically asserted the contentions of error. I write separately because to me it seems unusual that no case has given consideration to the two-track system (one can file a brief or not file a brief) before the Commission. In my view, the two-track aspect of the…