Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1950No. 16314PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This is an action to recover damages for alleged unlawful cancellation of an insurance certificate or policy issued to the plaintiff, B. W. McLaughlin, by the defendant, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, which has an insurance department incorporated under the laws of Ohio. The Court below held that the undisputed facts showed a wrongful cancellation and submitted to the jury only the question of damages. From the judgment entered on the verdict of the jury, the defendant has appealed. We shall refer to the parties as they appeared in the Court below.

The principal questions for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Connelly v. Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  2. Pack v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Shuler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Vivar v. Supreme Lodge of Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
  5. Hardee v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kentucky Home Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Glover v. North Carolina Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Davis v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Branham v. Capital Life & Health Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Winchester v. United Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API