People v. Mahoney
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAMIREZ, P. J.
A jury convicted defendant, Clark Alexander Mahoney, Jr., of possessing child pornography or child erotica. (Pen. Code, § 311.11, subd. (a).) He was granted probation and appeals, claiming there was insufficient evidence that the crime occurred within the statute of limitations, there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict, section 311.11, subdivision (a) is void for vagueness and the trial court erroneously failed to give the jury a unanimity instruction. We reject his contentions and affirm, while directing the trial court to correct errors in the minutes of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. John Charles KuchinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. FlyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- People v. CastilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. HERTZIGCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Shepherd CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Stringer CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Westmontgomery CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Sepulveda v. CovelloDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020