Legal Opinion

People v. Mahoney

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 2013No. E055162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

A jury convicted defendant, Clark Alexander Mahoney, Jr., of possessing child pornography or child erotica. (Pen. Code, § 311.11, subd. (a).) He was granted probation and appeals, claiming there was insufficient evidence that the crime occurred within the statute of limitations, there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict, section 311.11, subdivision (a) is void for vagueness and the trial court erroneously failed to give the jury a unanimity instruction. We reject his contentions and affirm, while directing the trial court to correct errors in the minutes of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. John Charles KuchinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. FlyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. People v. CastilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. HERTZIGCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Shepherd CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. Stringer CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. People v. Westmontgomery CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Sepulveda v. CovelloDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API