Legal Opinion
Maestro West Chelsea SPE LLC v. Pradera Realty Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eileen Bransten, J.
Motion sequence Nos. 001 and 003 are consolidated for disposition. In motion sequence No. 001, plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction, a mandatory injunction and a permanent injunction. Defendant opposes.
In motion sequence No. 003, defendant moves to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffs oppose.
I. Background
Plaintiffs own property located at 319, 321, 323 and 325 10th Avenue and 507, 509, 511, 513 and 515 West 28th Street in Manhattan, New York (the property). (Complaint If 14.) Plaintiffs plan to develop a mixed use residential and retail complex on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Nobu Next Door, LLC v. Fine Arts Housing, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Non-Linear Trading Co. v. Braddis Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cruz v. FXDirectDealer, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Swimwear Solution, Inc. v. Orlando Bathing Suit, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Landco H & L, Inc. v. 377 Main Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022