Legal Opinion · Dissent

Merker Counter Company, Inc. v. Central Counter Company

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 12, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6840Published

1DissentWorley, Chief Judge

“It is well established that the burden of proof rests upon one who seeks to cancel a registered mark. * * *” [James Huggins & Sons, Inc. v. Avenarius Bros. (Attorney General of the United States, substituted), 42 CCPA 1019, 223 F.2d 494, 106 USPQ 271.] (Italics supplied.) “In a cancellation proceeding, the situation is quite different [from ex parte and opposition proceedings]. The defendant in such proceeding is one who has obtained substantial rights from the Government upon or about which he may have built a large and, of course, legitimate business. The cancellation of one’s trade-mark…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sleepmaster Products Company, Inc. v. American Auto-Felt CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Application of MyersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. James Huggins & Sons, Inc. v. Avenarius Bros. (Attorney General of the United States, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API