Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Bannister

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 16, 1918No. 6 Div. 720PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cullman County; O. Kyle, Judge. Suit by W. E. Bannister against the Hartford Fire Insurance Company. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Appellee sued appellant on a fire insurance policy, and indorsed on the summons and complaint a demand for trial by jury.

The judgment entry recites:

“Thereupon the defendant * * * comes not but makes default. And a jury trial being waived by the plaintiff in this cause, and same being considered by the court, the court proceeds to ascertain the amount of plaintiff’s damages, which the court, by competent evidence, ascertains to be fifteen hundred dollars”

—and judgment was rendered accordingly.

The bill of exceptions shows that the plaintiff, in open court, waived a trial by jury before the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Manhattan Fire Insurance v. Fowler & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Florida Nursery & Trading Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Home Protection v. Caldwell Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Prudential Casualty Co. v. KerrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Bozeman v. DillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Blackmon v. W.S. Badcock Corp., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Garnett v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API