Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Hill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Marshall District Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

IiORTON, C. J.:

On November 14, 1885, W. H. H. Freeman commenced his action against Samuel Hill before a justice of the peace of Marshall county to recover $75 upon an appeal bond executed by Ed. W. Waynant, as administrator of the e'st'ate of J. B. Waynant, deceased, as principal, and Samuel Plill as surety. On December 1, 1885, he filed an amended bill of particulars claiming $185, setting up three causes of action, the second and third causes being new. Hill, by his attorneys, made a motion to strike out causes two and three, because they were not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. MilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. Sibert v. WilderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Spratly v. Putnam Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1869
  4. Freeman v. WaynantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rochester American Insurance v. Cassell Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. Schulte v. Westborough, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. McGinnis v. BeattyWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. Ralston v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. St. Louis Type Foundry Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API