Legal Opinion

Myers v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 13, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of tlie city of Richmond -on a motion to correct an erroneous assessment for taxes. Judgment for the defendant. Petitioner assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

This writ of error is to a final order of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond denying the application of the plaintiff in error to exonerate a fund on deposit to the credit of the chancery court of the city, in the creditors’ suit of S. H. Hawes & Co. v. W. R. Trigg Co., from an alleged erroneous assessment of taxes for the year 1904.

There had been no report of debts in the case at the time of the assessment, and the sole question for our determination is whether money arising from the sale of a debtor’s personal property at the suit of creditors is amenable to taxes before a report of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. KuykendallMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Fulkerson v. Treasurer of BristolSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Cooper v. Board of ReviewIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglass v. KoontzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Myers v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API