Legal Opinion

In Re the Discipline of Little

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1952No. C. D. 1816Published

1Opinion of the Court

40 Wn.2d 421 (1952)

244 P.2d 255

In the Matter of the Discipline of BRYCE LITTLE, an Attorney at Law.[1]

No. C.D. 1816.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc..

May 1, 1952.

A. Vernon Stoneman, for board of governors.

Alfred H. Lundin and Robert M. Burgunder, for respondent.

OLSON, J.

The state bar association filed charges of professional misconduct against the respondent, Bryce Little, who was admitted to the bar of the state of Washington in May, 1932. It prayed that he be disciplined as the facts and law warrant. A hearing lasting three days was had upon the charges before a trial committee of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of JettWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. In re the Proceedings for the Discipline of FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API