Legal Opinion
United States v. Stanko
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 13, 2008No. 07-1399PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
Rudolph George Stanko appeals his conviction and sentence for providing a false social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B). Stanko repeatedly sought a change of venue from Omaha to North Platte in the District of Nebraska. Because the district court failed to consider the relevant factors for a change of venue motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 18, we reverse Stanko’s conviction and remand this matter to the district court for a new trial after proper consideration of Stanko’s motion for change of venue. On remand, we also direct the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. Leslie Anderson and Leonard MooneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Test v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Kenneth Huie DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Harvey B. Young, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Dustin WortheyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. ShaferCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. PietrantonioCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.