Legal Opinion
Westen Sizzlin' v. Kelly
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 30, 1989No. 71597PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANSEN, Judge:
Claimant, respondent herein, filed an action for workers’ compensation benefits alleging injury to her tailbone. Through a settlement agreement, the court found Claimant sustained a 10 percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. As a part of the settlement, the parties agreed that in the event a change of condition occurred, then the settlement order could be reopened and reviewed as provided by law.
About 18 weeks later, Claimant filed a motion to reopen alleging she had sustained a change of condition for the worse requiring additional medical…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Orrick Stone Company v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Iwunoh v. Maremont Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- National Zinc Company v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Depue v. Barsh Truck LinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- McMurtry Bros. v. AngeloSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- H.R. Hill Trucking Co. v. HilburnCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997