Legal Opinion

In re Spangenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a contested probate proceeding, the objectants appeal from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, S.), dated March 17, 1997, as granted that branch of the proponent’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the objection to probate which alleged fraud and undue influence by the proponent, and the proponent cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied that branch of her motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the objection to probate which alleged lack of testamentary capacity.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ConiglioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re Estate of Harold RichtmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. In re the Estate of AlbertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SpinelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Matter of MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  3. Campo-Joseph v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re Estate of NeumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Miller v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API