Legal Opinion

In Re Aftermarket Automotive Lighting Products Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided February 10, 2009No. MDL No. 2621Published

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiff Dynacorn, Inc., has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for centralization of three actions in the Central District of California. Responding defendants 1 do not oppose plaintiffs motion. Plaintiffs in the two other actions and plaintiffs in three Central District of California potential tag-along actions- support centralization in the Central District of California. While supporting centralization, plaintiffs in a Central District of • California action (Sabry Lee) and potential tag-along action (Flash Sales)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Pfizer Inc. Securities, Derivative & "ERISA" LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API