Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Richardson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal, based upon the alleged failure of the appellant to pursue the remedy prescribed by Section 554, Or. L., as amended by Chapter 316, Gren. Laws of Or., 1927. Among other things, this section provides:

“Upon the appeal being perfected the appellant shall, within thirty days thereafter, file with the clerk of the appellate court a transcript or * * abstract * * .
“If the transcript or abstract is not filed with the clerk of the appellate court within the time provided, the appeal shall be deemed abandoned, and the effect thereof terminated, but the trial court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Borland v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Simpson v. WinegarOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Pearson v. LovejoyNew York Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Moore v. Marshalltown Opera-House Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. Miller v. ProughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brugger v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Guenther v. HeadrickOregon Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API