Peek v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Presiding Judge.
Following a bench trial, Peek was found guilty of aggravated assault. He appeals his conviction. We affirm.
1. Peek contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of aggravated assault. OCGA § 16-5-21 (a) (2) provides: “[a] person commits the offense of aggravated assault when he or she assaults . . . [w]ith a deadly weapon or with any object, device, or instrument which, when used offensively against a person, is likely to or actually does result in serious bodily injury.”
Viewed in a light most favorable to support the verdict, the evidence shows…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dunn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Lattimer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Cherry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Power v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- In the Interest of M. C., a ChildCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Jason Elridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026