Legal Opinion
State v. Carlson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1962No. File 9916PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The defendants were convicted of conspiracy as defined by SDC I960' Supp. 13.0306. The first three of the defendants, as they are named above, have appealed. By an adequate record and appropriate assignment they question the sufficiency of the evidence to support an inference that they conspired to commit an offense against the state of South Dakota as charged in the information.
In SO' far as it is pertinent SDC 1960 Supp. 13.0306 reads as follows:
“If two or more persons conspire * * * to com.mit any offense against the state of South Dakota * * * and one or more of such parties, do any act…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. SinnottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Asher v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garland Ray Gregory, Jr. v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- State v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. AnderbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Williamson v. EricksonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.