Legal Opinion

Ward v. Morlock

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 5, 2017No. Case 5D16-1641Published

1Opinion of the CourtLambert, J.

The issue that we address in this conflict of laws case is whether Florida’s dangerous instrumentality law should apply to a case arising out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred in South Carolina where the only two parties to the litigation are Florida residents. The material facts of the case are not in dispute. Appellee, Keith Mor-lock, and his family were vacationing in South Carolina with his brother-in-law, Paul Behrens, and his family. Behrens’ son needed a ride to a local airport, and Beh-rens asked Appellee if he could borrow his vehicle. Appellee consented, and while on the way…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Sosa v. SAFEWAY PREMIUM FINANCE CO.Supreme Court of Florida · 2011
  3. Spence v. Glock Ges M B HCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. Hopkins v. Lockheed Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  5. Sigalas v. Lido Maritime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API