Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided April 4, 1989No. 8810UC496PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Respondent-appellant BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corporation (BAPCO) brings this appeal from a 20 December 1987 order of the North Carolina Utilities Commission (Commission) directing respondent Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company (Southern Bell) to grant complainant Boulevard Florist, Inc. (Boulevard) a three-month billing credit in the amount of $450.72 for local telephone service and also directing both Southern Bell and BAPCO to grant complainant a three-month billing adjustment for advertising charges for the 1985 Yellow Pages advertisement *262placed by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Gas House, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Orange County v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abrons Fam. Prac. & Urgent Care, PA v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Buck Island, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989