Legal Opinion

Newton v. Batson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 3, 1953No. 16769PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this action, the respondent seeks to have lot No. 97, shown on a plat designated as “Crescent Terrace, property of Poinsett Realty Company in and adjoining Greenville, South Carolina,” dated July, 1919, and recorded in the office of the Register of Mesne Conveyances for Greenville County on August 10, 1919, and which lot adjoins the lot on which respondent’s home is situate, declared to be a park, and to restrain appellant from making any use of said lot inconsistent with its use as a park, and to require the appellant to remove all structures which she had placed thereon.

The appellant is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. ARCHAMBAULT v. SprouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  2. Austin v. GoddardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. Phipps v. PhippsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank v. KnottsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newton v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API