Legal Opinion
United States v. Frederick R. Schumacher
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 9, 2001No. 00-2129PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOGUE, District Judge.
Frederick Schumacher appeals from his conviction in the District Court 2 for mail fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and interstate transfer of stolen funds. Schumacher challenges the sufficiency of the evidence against him, argues that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his prior dealings with codefendant, John Anderson, and raises allegations of prosecutorial misconduct as the result of statements made during closing arguments. For the following reasons, we affirm.
In 1995, Schumacher, an attorney, Anderson, Craig Velasco, and Sam…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Michael E. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Thomas Alfred FlanaganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Guerrero-CortezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Harold Wrehe, United States of America v. Thomas C. Fischer, United States of America v. Mary Lou WreheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Jeffrey Thomas Holt, United States of America v. John Perfetto, A/K/A "Spud" Perfetto, United States of America v. Robert Brooks BallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Arlene Marie FrokjerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. FarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Vincente Espinoza, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Top of Iowa Cooperative v. ScheweDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- United States v. Arlene Marie FrokjerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.