Legal Opinion

Croxall v. Shererd

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 15, 1866PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This was a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. Robert .Morris Croxall, the plaintiff ill error, in September, 1863, — the year is important, — brought ejectment in that court to recover certain premises in New Jersey.

Read the full summary

This was a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. Robert .Morris Croxall, the plaintiff ill error, in September, 1863, — the year is important, — brought ejectment in that court to recover certain premises in New Jersey. The jury found a special verdict, in substance thus: On the 15th of November, 1793, Robert Morris, being seized in fee simple of certain lands in the State just named, an indenture tripartite was made between him, of the first part, Charles Croxall and Mary, his wife, of the second, and Robert Morris, Jr., Adam Hoops, and Aaron…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swayne

Whether under the deed of Robert Morris of the 15th November, 1798, Charles Croxall was tenant for life, remainder to Mary Croxall his wife, for life, remainder to their son Thomas Croxall in tail — whether Mary Croxall was not the donee in tail under the rulé in Shelley’s case, and if so, whether her estate was a legal or equitable one — and whether *281Thomas Croxall was not the donee or first tenant in tail, and if he were the first or the second tenant in tail, whether he took a legal estate by the operation of the statute of uses, then in force in New Jersey, or whether he took an equitable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blight's Lessee v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  3. Moore v. LyonsNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  4. Watkins v. Lessee of HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. United States v. BabbitSupreme Court of the United States · 1862

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. González RamosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API