Legal Opinion

Depew Development, Inc. v. AT & A Trucking Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied, cross motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court should have denied plaintiff’s motion and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment on the ground that defendant was a holder in due course of plaintiff’s checks. Plaintiff commenced this action to recover the face amount of unauthorized checks written on its account *975and made payable to defendant. The checks were forged by the parties’ mutual accountant. A holder in due course is defined by UCC 3-302 (1) as "a holder who takes the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chemical Bank v. HaskellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. American Express Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Corporacion Venezolana De Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  4. Crossland Savings, FSB v. Foxwood & Southern Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Gino's of Capri, Inc. v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Georg v. Metro Fixtures Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  2. Simpson & Simpson, PLLC v. Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. SIMPSON & SIMPSON, PLLC v. LIPPES MATHIAS WEXLER FRIEDMAN LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Simpson & Simpson, PLLC v. Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API