Depew Development, Inc. v. AT & A Trucking Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied, cross motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court should have denied plaintiff’s motion and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment on the ground that defendant was a holder in due course of plaintiff’s checks. Plaintiff commenced this action to recover the face amount of unauthorized checks written on its account *975and made payable to defendant. The checks were forged by the parties’ mutual accountant. A holder in due course is defined by UCC 3-302 (1) as "a holder who takes the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chemical Bank v. HaskellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. American Express Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Corporacion Venezolana De Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Crossland Savings, FSB v. Foxwood & Southern Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Gino's of Capri, Inc. v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Georg v. Metro Fixtures Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Simpson & Simpson, PLLC v. Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- SIMPSON & SIMPSON, PLLC v. LIPPES MATHIAS WEXLER FRIEDMAN LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Simpson & Simpson, PLLC v. Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015