Legal Opinion
Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Teamsters Local 206
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 9, 2006No. Civil 06-848-KIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KING, District Judge.
Plaintiff Fred Meyer, Inc. brings suit under the Labor Management Relations Act and Federal Arbitration Act asking the court to vacate an arbitrator’s opinion interpreting the Collective Bargaining Agreement (“Agreement”) between Fred Meyer and Teamsters Local 206 (the “Union”). Before the court is Fred Meyer’s Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (# 18) and a Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award (# 6) filed by Teamsters Local 206. For the following reasons, I deny Fred Meyer’s motion and grant in part and deny in part the motion filed by Teamsters Local 206.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Major League Baseball Players Assn. v. GarveySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Stead Motors of Walnut Creek v. Automotive MacHinists Lodge No. 1173, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union 420 v. Kinney Air Conditioning Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- International Union of Petroleum and Industrial Workers v. Western Industrial Maintenance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.