Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Cortland

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 2, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore Citjr (Heuisleb, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtTiiomas, J.

This appeal is by the caveators, plaintiffs, from the ruling of the Superior Court of Baltimore City in the trial of issues concerning the will of James Cortland.

The record contains but one bill of exceptions, and that refers only to the action of the Court below in rejecting the plaintiffs’ prayer and to the granting of the “Court’s Instruction,” both of which rel ate to the issue of undue influence.

In order to understand the question we are to consider, it will he necessary to refer briefly to some of the evidence in the case. Rut in doing so we are not to he understood as emphasizing that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1833
  2. Hiss v. WeikCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  3. Moore ex rel. Moore v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Everett's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  2. White v. BrambleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  3. In Re RaynoldsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
  4. Smith v. DiggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  5. Drury v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API