Legal Opinion

Denise v. Welch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The action against appellant was not commenced within the period required by section 71 of the Stock Corporation Law which is an integral part of the statute under which plaintiff is claiming the right of recovery. (Hill v. Supervisors of Rensselaer County, 119 N. Y. 344.) (See, also, Matter of Keep, 241 App. Div. -, decided herewith.) As to the sufficiency of the complaint so far as it relates to the character of the occupation of plaintiff’s assignors coming within the statute, we are bound by our former decision (239 App. Div. 805).

All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hill v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Powers v. FoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. In re the Estate of KupofskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API