Legal Opinion

Theodore O. Bates, Cross-Appellee v. Prudential-Grace Lines, Inc., Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 17, 1974No. 72-2659, 72-2689PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Bates was employed as a deck department seaman on the SS SANTA REGINA, a merchant vessel owned and operated by Prudential-Grace Lines, Inc. While the vessel was moored at a port in Chile, Bates took shore leave, and, as he was walking along the pier at which the vessel was docked, he stepped into a hole in the pier and suffered injuries. The hole was located about 580 feet from the vessel’s gangway. Bates instituted suit against his employer under the provisions of the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688. In a jury trial, the jury resolved the issue of liability in favor of Bates and fixed his…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bates v. Prudential-Grace Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1972

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sims v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. Sims v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Callbreath v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API