Legal Opinion

Porterfield v. Farmers Exchange Bank of Gallatin

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 14, 1931PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this proceeding Katherine Porterfield, guardian and curator of her minor children, Dorothy and Byron, seeks to impress upon the funds and assets of the defunct bank mentioned in the title a preferred claim in the sum of $20,000. The trial court disallowed the claim in toto, either as preferred or general. Plaintiff appealed.

In order to more fully understand the actions of the parties connected with this case, a short history of the matter must be related. Plaintiff's husband, a physician, practicing medicine at Jamesport, Missouri, and Dr. R.V. Thompson, cashier of the defunct bank, had…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Midland National Bank of Kansas City v. BrightwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Huntsville Trust Co. Ex Rel. Cantley v. NoelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  4. Mann v. Bank of GreenfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. Evangelical Synod of North America v. SohoeneichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Trenton Trust Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Prather v. Colorado Oil & Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Commerce Trust v. Farmers' Exch. Bk. of GallatinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Beall v. Farmers' Exchange Bank of Gallatin (Mo. 1934)Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  5. Hagan v. LantrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API