Legal Opinion
Matuska v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1992No. Civ. 910293PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDEWALLE, Justice.
Mike J. Matuska appealed from a district court judgment affirming the Workers Compensation Bureau’s order awarding him benefits on a 50 percent aggravation basis. We affirm.
Matuska, while employed by Funfar Construction, Inc., injured his back on October 24, 1989, when he was carrying plywood sheets and shingle bundles on the roof of a house. Matuska did not know he had hurt his back until he returned home from work that evening and later discovered that he “could barely move around.” Matuska consulted Dr. Paul Davis, a Fargo chiropractor, the following day.
In his office…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dewey J. Hassler v. Casper Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Claim of BromleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Howes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Hayes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Roberts v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Spangler v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Wherry v. North Dakota State HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Johnson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Dyer v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Rieniets v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.