Legal Opinion

Trunk v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 7, 2007No. 06cv1597-LAB (WMc), 06cv1728-LAB (WMc)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS FOR LACK OF STANDING; AND ORDER DISMISSING CITY OF SAN DIEGO; AND ORDER ENTERING JUDGMENT AS TO DISMISSED CLAIMS

LARRY ALAN BURNS, District Judge.

On September 8, 2006, Plaintiffs Steve Trunk and Philip Paulson filed their First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Specifically, Plaintiffs seek a declaration that transfer of a certain parcel of land on Mt. Soledad to the federal government violates Plaintiffs’ rights under the U.S. and California constitutions, and that the statute authorizing it be declared void ab initio. Plaintiffs also…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trunk v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2008
  2. Talavera v. Global Payments, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API