Legal Opinion

Lemieux's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

It is admitted that the employee was injured on July 7, 1913, and that he has received partial compensation and an additional compensation under the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act, St. 1911, c. 751, Part II, § 11, as amended by St. 1913, c. 445.

*347The only question now presented is whether upon the facts the employee is entitled to receive a further twenty-five weeks’ additional compensation for a hand “permanently incapable of use,” under the provisions of St. 1913, c. 445, § 1, as amended by St. 1914, c. 708, § 6 (e).

On May 12, 1915, the Industrial Accident Board wrote to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Hunnewell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Herrick's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Meley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Employers' Mutual Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  2. Hummer's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Nega v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Maxwell's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  5. McDonald v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API