Legal Opinion

City Nat. Bank of Spur v. Rhome-Farmer Livestock Commission Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 24, 1923No. 10441. [fn*]Published

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; R. E. D. Roy, Judge. Action by the Rhome-Earmer Livestock Commission Company against the City National Bank of Spur and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and named defendant appeals.

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

[7] Appellant bank urges that the evidence in the statement of facts fails to sustain the finding of the jury to special issues 2, 3, 4, and 5. That since appellee offered E. C. Ed-monds, president of defendant bank, as a witness, it vouched for his credibility, and cannot question his testimony except to show that he was honestly mistaken. He cites in support of this proposition such cases as G., C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 28 Tex. Civ. App. 395, 67 S. W. 182; Casey-Swasey Co. v. Virginia State Insurance Co., 33 Tex. Civ. App. 85, 75 S. W. 911; Paxton v. Boyce, 1…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paxton v. BoyceTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Barnard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Casey-Swasey Co. v. Virginia State InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API