Legal Opinion

Hunt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1928No. 18979Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION EOR REHEARING.

Bloodworth, J.

The plaintiff in error alleges that “the court overlooked the verdict of the jury trying the case acquitting the defendant on the first count and finding him guilty on the 3d count, as shown by the record in this ease,” and insists that a rehearing should be granted him because “the verdict is contrary to law,” which is the 3d ground of the original motion for a new trial. The court did not overlook the verdict of the jury which tried the case. In Empire Cotton Oil Co. v. Continental Gin Co., 21 Ga. App. 16, 18 (93 S. E. 525), on motion for a new hearing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roberts v. KeelerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Newberry v. TenantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Callaway v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Hayden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  5. Rodgers v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API