Legal Opinion

Roark & Hardee L.P. v. City of Austin

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided October 18, 2005No. 2:05-cr-00837PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SPARKS, District Judge.

BE IT REMEMBERED on the 11th day of October 2005, the Court called the above-styled cause for a hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which was filed on September 16, 2005, before it was removed to this Court on September 26, 2005. At the close of the hearing, the Court granted the parties leave to file additional briefing or evidence regarding this motion. Having considered the motion, Defendant’s response, the supplemental evidence and briefing filed by the parties, the arguments of counsel at the hearing, the relevant law, and the case file as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roark & Hardee LP v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. SO Apartments v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  5. Liebes v. Dept. of Public HealthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API