Legal Opinion

Humble Pipe Line Company v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 29, 1960No. 3766PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIREY, Justice.

This is a suit for injuries to land alleged to have resulted from the pollution of a water well by crude oil. Appellees specifically alleged that the oil came from a leak in defendant’s pipe line, and that the oil penetrated the soil and the water bearing formation of appellees’ land. Originally two separate suits were filed, and they were consolidated by order of the court prior to trial because there was only one water well involved, it being a boundary line well in which the appellees owned equal rights. The well in question is a shallow, hand-dug well approximately 18 feet…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Wichita Falls & Oklahoma Railway Co. v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Turner v. Big Lake Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. CurrieTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. OakesTexas Supreme Court · 1900

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maranatha Temple, Inc. v. Enterprise Products Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  2. Moran Corporation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Lacy Feed Company v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P. v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon Gardiner, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  5. Kennedy v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API