Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Chicago Tunnel Terminal Corp., Debtor. Chicago Tunnel Terminal Corp. v. Rutland Transit Company, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 11, 1957No. 11937_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

Recently, during our review of a tort complaint, we pointed up the extant integration between the parent corporation, Chicago Tunnel Terminal Corporation and its subsidiaries, Chicago Tunnel Company, Chicago Tunnel Terminal Company and Chicago Tunnel Transport Company. Sisco-Hamilton Co. v. Lennon, 7 Cir., 1957, 240 F.2d 68. Now the parent, debtor, non-operating company, Chicago Tunnel Terminal Corporation, is before us complaining of its exclusion from the benefits of reorganization under Chapter X, 11 U.S.C.A. § 501 et seq., despite current pendency of reorganization…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seifried v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  2. Sisco-Hamilton Co. v. George W. Lennon, Trustee of Chicago Tunnel Terminal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Chicago Tunnel Terminal Corporation, a Corporation, Bankrupt v. Rutland Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  2. In the Matter of the Chicago Tunnel Terminal Corp., Debtor. Chicago Tunnel Terminal Corp. v. Rutland Transit Company, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API