Legal Opinion

State v. Pottle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1984No. TC 20-567B, CA A22439, SC 29615 and 29616Published

1Opinion of the Court

677 P.2d 1 (1984)

296 Or. 274

STATE of Oregon, Respondent On Review, and Petitioner On Review,

v.

Craig Steven POTTLE, Petitioner On Review and Respondent On Review.

Nos. TC 20-567B, CA A22439, SC 29615 and 29616.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted October 5, 1983.

Decided January 24, 1984.

Stephen J. Williams, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner/respondent on review, Pottle. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Stephen F. Peifer, Deputy Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Peterson; Dissent · Jones.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API